shanmonster: (For goodness sakes. I've got the....)

Out of curiosity, I went looking for Jehovah's Witnesses on LiveJournal, and I've discovered a few interesting things. For example, one JW pioneer has the following interests: Kill Bill, fairies, Harry Potter, horror stories, and The Sixth Sense. She uses the word "frigging" in her post, and posted a silly online quiz which predicted whether or not she would get laid in high school. To top it off, some JWs are using rather sexy images for their LJ icons.

This is in stark contrast to what would have been considered appropriate when I was involved with the JWs. I'd have been up shit creek for using a sexual term like "frigging," and publicly posting the probability of my fornicating would have been a distinct no-no. Demonstrating an interest in the supernatural, gory movies, and other naughty things would surely have been a stumbling block for other JWs, and would also have been showing off just how worldly and tainted by Satan I was. I'd have been labelled bad association, for sure.

Has there been such a paradigm shift in the religion that these things are now acceptable? I remember being very surprised when I discovered the whole 1914 thing had been ripped from the doctrine, and that was one of the core tenets. What next? Shall blood transfusions be considered ok?

I predict they shall, actually, but not for a while. And then, new JWs will be offended if anyone should ever say blood transfusions were ever considered disfellowshipping offenses. I've already spoken with JWs who have never heard anything special about the year 1914, aside from it being the year WWI began. Plenty of JWs are out there who've never heard of the injunction against vaccinations or the paranoia surrounding organ transplants, and even more who are unaware of miracle wheat and the role of pyramids in early JW doctrine.

So what's up, now, anyhow?

Date: 2004-09-20 08:40 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] uber-wench.livejournal.com
Whoa! Yeah, that would get you labelled a bad association for sure if you got caught posting it. But then again, it was okay for the elder in my congregation who abused a 14 year boy I knew to get off with a reprimand and not be allowed to be an elder anymore. Any police invovlement discouraged, of course.

Date: 2004-09-20 08:44 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] shanmonster.livejournal.com
Elders are special cases, of course.

Date: 2004-09-20 08:45 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] shanmonster.livejournal.com
Did the boy get in trouble, instead?

aexample?

Date: 2004-09-20 08:50 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] elanya.livejournal.com
*Prints this out and frames it as the one time I will ever get to point out one of *your* typos ;)

Also, I wonder if it is partly a generation-gap/technology use issue that is letting younger LJ using folk get away with this kind of thing, and also allowing them to have their horizons broadened a bit?

Re: aexample?

Date: 2004-09-20 08:54 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] shanmonster.livejournal.com
Ha!

Fixed.

I think technology has a LOT to do with the relaxation of JW beliefs. When I was a kid, the only apostate literature to be had was hardcopy. It was easy to be dinged for having contraband books. However, with the internet, it's easy for a JW to be sneaky and do research on their religion without having anyone aware of it.

Since more people are finding out about the flip side of the religion, more and more people are leaving the religion. I'm guessing that a relaxation of the rules is happening in an attempt to keep more people within the religion.

Date: 2004-09-20 10:36 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] niyabinghi.livejournal.com
Ever read [livejournal.com profile] jourdannex? She's an ex-JW, and a real hoot.

Date: 2004-09-21 02:27 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] shanmonster.livejournal.com
I just looked her up. You're right! She is definitely entertaining!

Date: 2004-09-20 10:40 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] tsimshian529.livejournal.com
They pulled the 1914 thing??!! WOW! I remember there was a lady who swore her mom was one of the chosen ones for the 144,000. Hmm. I think I need to do some research one night. (oh and my user pic here is a direct slap in the face to my old JW elders, Bettie Paige Tattooed!)

Date: 2004-09-21 02:17 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] shanmonster.livejournal.com
Yeah, I think it was pulled about ten years ago.

I'm not sure how the changes have been incorporated into the Memorial and the Remnant.

Date: 2004-09-20 10:41 pm (UTC)From: [identity profile] kitschicat.livejournal.com
It's crazy what was considered so taboo when I was growing up is now "no big deal."

So glad to be out of the Wacky Witnesses. ;)

Date: 2004-09-21 02:18 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] shanmonster.livejournal.com
Me too!

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 16171819 2021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 03:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios