A couple of months ago, I started watching CSI and its various incarnations, and I'm hooked. I still don't have television, but I do have a working DVD player and a friendly neighbourhood video shop, so last week I rented the first season of CSI: NY. And today I rented the first season of CSI. I'm beginning to think it isn't a normal day if I don't see blood and semen. When I find a stray hair on something, I get the paranoid thought that I need to run it for DNA. I'm afraid I might soon believe that I can fingerprint matches in just 90 seconds. Lord help me....
A couple of things irk me about the show. First of all, I'm a copy editor at heart. I can't help it. I see misspelled words, and something catches in my mind, distracting the heck out of me. So when a popup screen happens (as in the case of a fingerprint match, or DNA test, or even a weekly schedule), I usually feel glitchy. I couldn't figure out why until I freeze-framed one of them and saw it was rife with typos. Sometimes those screens are only viewable for half of a second, but its long enough for my brain to catch the error. I'm surprised that with all the clever writing that they couldn't be arsed to run a spell check. Ah well.
The next thing that irks me is this: these people are ostensibly testing evidence to find minute particles of skin, hairs, and what-have-you. So how come they're not working in sterile environments with the appropriate clothing and hair nets? I already know the answer to this: because it's not sexy. CSI agents are supposed to be hotties, and you can't be a hottie in one of those haz-mat suits, right? So I can forgive this for the sake of the eye candy.
Some of the software is downright ridiculous. I mean, even Star Trek with all its futuristic technology can't do what the CSI labs can do with a simple point and click. But that's ok. A 3-week wait for fingerprint results would really slow the show down to a grinding halt. So I suspend my disbelief.
I just can't forgive those lousy typos. Gah!
A couple of things irk me about the show. First of all, I'm a copy editor at heart. I can't help it. I see misspelled words, and something catches in my mind, distracting the heck out of me. So when a popup screen happens (as in the case of a fingerprint match, or DNA test, or even a weekly schedule), I usually feel glitchy. I couldn't figure out why until I freeze-framed one of them and saw it was rife with typos. Sometimes those screens are only viewable for half of a second, but its long enough for my brain to catch the error. I'm surprised that with all the clever writing that they couldn't be arsed to run a spell check. Ah well.
The next thing that irks me is this: these people are ostensibly testing evidence to find minute particles of skin, hairs, and what-have-you. So how come they're not working in sterile environments with the appropriate clothing and hair nets? I already know the answer to this: because it's not sexy. CSI agents are supposed to be hotties, and you can't be a hottie in one of those haz-mat suits, right? So I can forgive this for the sake of the eye candy.
Some of the software is downright ridiculous. I mean, even Star Trek with all its futuristic technology can't do what the CSI labs can do with a simple point and click. But that's ok. A 3-week wait for fingerprint results would really slow the show down to a grinding halt. So I suspend my disbelief.
I just can't forgive those lousy typos. Gah!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 12:47 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)In the real world, lab technicians work 9a-5p in the lab. They don't carry guns and they don't arrest people, as far as i know.
-starhawk
no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 01:10 am (UTC)From:I've only seen a few episodes of those kinda shows. One of them that made me laugh was an episode of CSI Miami in which they recovered a bullet and determined that "it had been shot from a .30-06." How could they know that when there are soooo many commercial and custom cartridges using the same diameter of bullet? (Probably the same weight and rifle-twist, too.)
Oh well.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 01:19 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 02:53 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 03:45 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 02:05 am (UTC)From:folks, and not writers.
And if you're able to suspend your disbelief with
this tripe, I'd like to recommend that you watch
24.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 01:36 pm (UTC)From:At least CSI doesn't condition its viewers to believe that torture works. The worst thing CSI has done is condition jurors to expect DNA testing in every criminal case, including misdemeanors.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 02:55 pm (UTC)From:I like to yell "horseshit!" at my monitor from time to time.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-12 12:22 am (UTC)From:As far as typos go, there was a typo on the recent 2-hour TV movie of Knight Rider (which was a test-bed for a possible new incarnation of the series) and that typo totally pissed me off! and it was on-screen for about 2 seconds. The car can talk but it can't fucking spell.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 03:00 am (UTC)From:But that show is soooo fake.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 02:55 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 04:26 am (UTC)From:I love that they use good body language, however. Notice that when he's confronting someone, he steps back one pace with his right foot and turns slightly so his right shoulder rears back. It's a full-on threat move, subliminally telling the opposition that he could just possibly come forward with a right cross to the jaw.
I learned that from a Hell's Angel.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 02:57 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 05:27 pm (UTC)From:You're so right! yes, keep your mouth shut, Himbo!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 05:44 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 03:04 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-03-12 12:25 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 07:41 am (UTC)From:That being said ... a similar gripe -- DNA results do not come back *inside* of an hour ... its more a matter of weeks or months.
The truism is that they have to compress time, for the sake of story-telling -- but why not do something like DaVinci's Inquest, where some investigations would take place, off and on, in the course of a number of weeks? *Much* more realistic ... and has the advantage of a continuing plot thread to draw people back.
But maybe, unlike Canada, the American public doesn't have that long an attention span?
no subject
Date: 2008-03-11 08:01 pm (UTC)From: