Stop it.
It's not "couldn't of," "shouldn't of," or "wouldn't of." It's "couldn't have," "shouldn't have," or "wouldn't have."
This particular misuse of the English language rankles me even more than "alot," and about the same as using an apostrophe for plural's.
(That hurt me.)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 02:41 am (UTC)From: (Anonymous)It's still wrong, though, as this would have to be spelled 'shouldn't've.'
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 02:44 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 04:09 am (UTC)From:- Misuse of comparatives. It's "rather THAN" not "then". "Then" is linear or cause-and-effect and just Does. Not. Work. It really isn't all that hard.
- Misuse of homonyms/heterographs: two/to/too, their/they're/there, your/you're, its/it's (this one trips me up at times, too). The time it takes to decipher what someone is trying to say tends to make what they DO have to say worthless. If they can't be bothered to use the correct word, then I can't be bothered to figure out what they mean.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 07:22 am (UTC)From:Shanmonster, are you familiar with Hyperbole and a Half? http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.com/2010/04/alot-is-better-than-you-at-everything.html
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 03:30 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 03:16 pm (UTC)From:Lately, I bristle at phased instead of fazed, as in "that doesn't faze me at all," and especially when the errors come from English teachers.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 03:24 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 03:40 pm (UTC)From:*big grin*
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 03:38 pm (UTC)From:I just read a cheesy vampire book. Every time they're hungry, the writer says they need to "slack their thirst." The first time, it could be a typo. One over which the copyeditor, if there was one (and I doubt it) should die, but still. The second and third times, though, *I* about died.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 03:49 pm (UTC)From:I was at a reading put on by a writing group, and one of the authors used variations on the word "writhe" throughout her story. It wouldn't've (heh) been so bad, except she consistently mispronounced it as rhyming with "with," but with the hard "th" sound like at the beginning of "the." It hurt me so much!
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 08:15 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 07:57 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 03:51 am (UTC)From:The; dog chased;; the cat up the tree;
no subject
Date: 2011-02-09 02:07 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 08:39 pm (UTC)From:One I felt was even more cringeworthy that emerged briefly a few years ago was "wala" (voila misspelled), remember? And it eventually died. This will too. I hope.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 08:43 pm (UTC)From:I bought a pattern a while back, and in the instructions was a dreaded "wala". I stared at it in confusion for a while until I finally figured out what it was supposed to be, and then I did a pretty good facepalm.
Seriously, it doesn't even sound like "wala"! There is a definite V sound. Yikes! Not sure how that happened, except through some sort of "Chinese telephone" kind of thing.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-08 09:15 pm (UTC)From:Hey, there's an idea--get Scott Adams aware of the situation!